The only reason it is liability protected is that people were hurt and the vaccine manufacturers don't want to be sued into the poor house. If they take the protection off there will be no more bad vaccines.
Experts warn mRNA vaccines could cause irreversible genetic damage https://duckduckgo.com/?t=palemoon&...ould+cause+irreversible+genetic+damage&ia=web The people getting a gene altering vaccine will probably never know they could be to stupid to know what happen. Altering your genetic code is altering things about you that make you an intelligent human.
Where Are You in Line for the Vaccine? Enter your age, health, and county of residence, on the site above, and it will return an estimate of how many people are ahead of you for receiving a Covid-19 vaccine.
The vaccine that got emergency approval in the UK and that BioNTech/Pfizer applied for in the US and the EU as well is an mRNA one originally developed by Ingmar Hoerr of CureVac (based in Tübingen). It is one of the advantages of mRNA that it just carries the necessary information needed for an immune response and then disappears again without doing any harm. "In contrast, most vaccines use weakened or inactivated versions or components of the disease-causing pathogen to stimulate the body’s immune response to create antibodies." https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/hcp/mrna-vaccine-basics.html This is what the German Ingmar Hoerr whose research laid the foundation for mRNA vaccines has to say: "Medgadget: How is CureVac changing the future of healthcare? Dr. Hoerr: For a long time it was thought that it is impossible to utilize RNA, the oldest biomolecule, for medical purposes. It was generally accepted that, despite their advantages, messenger (m)RNAs were too unstable and too difficult to manipulate to be efficiently used in the medical field. We overcame these hurdles, and today we can modify and improve messenger RNA by sequence-modification, using naturally occurring nucleotides that greatly enhance the stability and the translation levels without changing the amino acid sequence of the corresponding protein. Now we can harness the previously unknown capabilities of this molecule. Our goal is to provide the patient’s body with the specific information that is stored in the RNA and allow the body produce its own, custom-tailored therapeutics or prophylactic vaccines. Importantly, mRNA is non-replicative and its half-life does not usually exceed a few days, which makes mRNA a transient and safe genetic carrier that has been shown to stimulate both humoral (antibody-mediated) responses and cellular (antigen-specific T-cell) responses." https://www.medgadget.com/2014/05/conversation-on-curevacs-rna-based-therapeutics-with-ceo-ingmar-hoerr.html
It all comes down to one question. If the vaccines were safe why do they need legal protection??? If they take away the legal protection even Bill Gates would not make it.
For me, it doesn't. Why demand something just from one person/producer while others can enjoy protection? Nothing on earth is a 100% safe except death, no jet, no nuke power station, no train, no bridge. People know that and make choices. It's always about probability and proportionality. What would happen if there were no legal protection at all? Would anyone stick their neck out? Why do all businesses down to the smallest Limited Company claim legal protection and hedge against risks? BTW, that giant trade agreement between the EU and the US failed because US companies didn't want to accept European court ruling but wanted to enjoy comprehensive legal protection against all claims. And pharma businesses should not be allowed the same freedom? If there weren't legal protection for doctors, to give another example, no doctor would carry out a single operation. Patients, as a rule, agree to being operated on before the operation begins or they decide not to be operated on. Choices.
When some is held responsible for what they make the product become better. Why did they get legal protection is because their product was hurting people and they wanted an out so the medical mafia pushed the government to give them a get out of jail card.free. If anyone speaks out against vaccine they are banned censored and everything else why? Are they so afraid of the fact they they destroy any opinion that does not agree with them. Would you buy a car that the manufacturer was liability free if it blow up after you bought it of course not but you would take an known poison injected into your body no questions asked.
Putin orders 'large-scale' COVID-19 vaccination in Russia. President Vladimir Putin has ordered a “large-scale” COVID-19 immunisation campaign to start by late next week, with doctors and teachers set to be first in line to get a Russian-designed vaccine that has yet to complete the advanced studies needed to ensure its effectiveness and safety in line with established scientific protocols. Putin’s action came on Wednesday, hours after Britain became the first country in the West to authorise the use of a vaccine against the coronavirus developed by US drugmaker Pfizer and Germany’s BioNTech. Russia touted its domestically developed vaccine, Sputnik V, as the world’s “first registered COVID-19 vaccine” after the government gave it regulatory approval in early August. Hello Vladimir. So pleased you have offered your "world first" vaccine to the rest of the world. And calling the vaccine "sputnik" after USSR Cold War Communist space rockets.. is a cool touch.. I must not say.
hahaha...... who wants to know the truth? Already in February, the effective proven method to eliminate the virus (if there is one), or to eliminate the health problems (there are those happening in under 3% that is right or wrong called cvd) was publicized and used in New York City Hospitals and in Wuhan China. INEXPENSIVE, non-patentable, known for a century almost. No side effects (except to politicians and bigpharmas pocket books) .... ... well, as they said long ago - to find the reason for the lies, follow the money .... as long as they make so much money, they're not going to tell the truth to anyone, until it doesn't matter any more... (if then) ....
All this and the vaccine makers are not legally held responsible for. These are not side effects but effects. Knowledge is power know what you are in for.
p.s. Everyone's body reacts to artificial toxins/substances injected by trying to get rid of them - by trying to detoxify the poisons/ free radicals. If any is taken, willingly or not, take antioxidants like vitamin C as able - it even protects sometimes against the side effects of toxic chemo. ====================================================================== prologue The Virus That Isn’t There ...Rappoport October The virus that isn’t there22, 2020 (To join our email list, click here.) Recently, I’ve written a series of articles... Post by: Martin Alonzo, Oct 23, 2020 in forum: Viruses Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm by John P ... https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25344291-dr-andrew-moulden Canadian physician Dr. Andrew Moulden provided clear scientific evidence to prove that every dose of vaccine given to a child or an adult produces harm. The truth that he uncovered was rejected by the conventional medical system and the pharmaceutical industry. ==================================================================== Today's search results just now: UK probes possible allergic reactions to COVID-19 shot ... https://www.timesofisrael.com/uk-pr...s-to-covid-19-shot-after-2-adverse-responses/ UK probes possible allergic reactions to COVID-19 shot after 2 adverse responses Medical official warns those with significant history of allergic reactions not to get Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus ... UK warns people with serious allergies to avoid Pfizer ... https://www.reuters.com/article/hea...ine-after-two-adverse-reactions-idUSKBN28J1DX Britain's medicine regulator has advised that people with a history of significant allergies do not get Pfizer-BioNTech's COVID-19 vaccine after two people reported severe adverse reactions on the ... UK issues allergy warning on Pfizer vaccine after two ... https://www.dhakatribune.com/world/...on-pfizer-vaccine-after-two-adverse-reactions Pfizer said people with a history of severe adverse allergic reactions were excluded from their late stage trials Britain's medicine regulator has advised that people with a history of significant allergic reactions do not get Pfizer-BioNTech's Covid-19 vaccine after two people reported adverse ... UK sees two adverse reactions to new COVID vaccine https://www.iheartradio.ca/610cktb/...rse-reactions-to-new-covid-vaccine-1.14128505 UK regulators say people who have a "significant history" of allergic reactions shouldn't receive the new Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine. Officials say they need time to investigate two adverse reactions that occurred on the first day of the country's mass vaccination program.
Here is a doctor who seen through this virus. Former president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Dr. Lee Merrit https://www.bitchute.com/video/8BwlQ7Ja5wSE/