There is nothing wrong with peaceful protests but the libs think that the looting and rioting is okay also. I saw on another forum some big mouth lib say "so what" that they're looting and rioting...they have every right to be angry. I can just imagine if the rioters and looters went to her little bungalow and looted her nice new closet she spent months on turning a spare bedroom into a closet. Bet she'd be calling the police because she's also anti gun. They all have big mouths but would change their tune if it was happening to them. Snicker and QFT. Lolololol
Other than the fact that Soros is a billionaire and holds dual citizenships from Hungary and the U.S.A. I really haven't done a pure study on him. At first glance though, one would assume that he just gets his kicks from creating a lot of havoc after he crashed the British silver banks. But, try thinking of him in another light. I do believe that G. Soros is a student of philosophical theorists that were born in the likes of Nietzsche and others like him. It's a kind of "from chaos to calm" thing whereby calm can come from chaos if (a) a solution can be found or (b) in the wake of chaos the havoc itself becomes considered the new norm, or calm. Taking both a and b in I do believe he is trying for B. In his mind, to help create havoc he can better predict the outcome and by knowing the outcome he can better predict his place in society. A society in which the abstract is so much a common place that an emotional response to a riot is as nothing more than a squabble between husband and wife. The fact does remain that if one intentionally starts a fire he can better control it and manage it's burning. In this political/financial/power type of fire he can now start to dictate who has wealth, power, and limited control over any and all financial resources with him as the holder of the match and the catalyst that creates chaos to norm and more chaos ad infinitum until he or one of his puppets becomes king or queen!
he's leading the charge for this new world order. destroy the worlds economy and take over. Osama and Hillary have both bought it. and why not?? they get well paid for their support. if you hold money under Clinton's nose she'll follow you anywhere
Very true perhaps but I do believe his sights are set somewhat smaller, for the time being anyway. By financing "black lives matter" and other associated groups he is purposely providing the platform for a socio-economic flux much like the pre American civil war period. As long as these groups can feel a financial gain then they become his progeny of chaos and by choosing to finance those who at least pretend to sympathize with these groups, ie the Clintons, Obama's et.al. he has his generals and lieutenants to take command with himself as the puppet master. Note: The timing couldn't be more perfect. Every single time there is a new president elected in the U.S the stock market takes a huge hit. Add in a massive amount of civil unrest and that down turn in the market will be even more exaggerated which might cause a complete collapse in America's ability to trade and our money about as worthless as the Continental dollar of pre-revolutionary war. Now, add in the third factor which is the culmination of the first two and we have the ultimate chaos which will probably be a civil war resulting in a push for anarchy especially if the Clintons grab the white house. Companies like Apple, Starbucks, Ford and the larger finance companies all know the ramifications and are trying to nose in to position of favor should such an upheaval occur. Pretty much, everything depends on how quickly we regain control of the market post election. But as long as Soros is alive he still commands a large influence over the commodities and money markets so it might not be that easy. As long as our dollar remains on the trust market rather than the gold standard we face a 20 trillion dollar debt that can be called in at any time and we have nothing to back it up except the U.S. Itself. Soros knows that the U.S. Is the fulcrum and if he can control that fulcrum then he can indeed move the world.
I was invested in Northrop/Grumman for many years. in late 2007 they sent me a letter saying since a democrat was likely to be elected be advised stocks may plummet. they were right and I pulled out. that speaks volumes