So, how does he blame Obama admin. now for not stopping the Russian election interference during the election. Uh? Sucking and blowing at the same time comes to mind.
I, for one, do not believe that we had any Russian influence during the election. However, if there was some happening, and Obama didn't take care of it (or at least bring it out at that time), then it happened during his presidency, so he is responsible. Obviously, they all thought that Hillary was winning, so no one wanted to say that the Russians were interfering since it would have looked like they were helping Hillary if it was brought up during the election process. Once they realized that Trump had won the election, then they decided to blame that on the Russians. If Hillary had won, we would never have been hearing that the Russians interfered , even if they did do that.
Honestly Yvonne, I roll my eyes more at politics than anything else If you didn't laugh about it all, you'd go @Yvonne Smith
Anything coming out of the main street media is BS. Just remember they all agreed and had proof of weapons of mass destruction with oficial government proof. The election where they had Hillary guaranteed to win by 80% with all there pol evidence. They go on and on over Russia like a bunch of spoiled brats not willing to think their god Hillary could have lost. How many news media have said they have unknown sources, or government employee giving them the story. Every time we ask the government to verify there information they say they cannot because nation security. On the other hand you can not refuse anything they want or they will say if you have nothing to hide then you will tell us, dose that not go both ways
You're entitled to believe what you want,say what you wand and offer an opinion. Good for you. But while you're entitled to such you're not entitled to your own facts and there seem to be plenty of facts on the subject. Just a few that are listed. https://www.google.com/search?q=what+agencies+have+proof+of+russian+hacking&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
Your right the web is full of fake news you done a google search and brought up CNN, NYtimes, Wire.com ABCnews the hill. All these gave Hillary 80% chance of winning the election so they are fake news
Now, do tell me what or rather " how" you found out that what those agencies report isn't as fake as rock hard ta-ta's? Research is not dependent upon what the media of any kind has to allow but what we actually know to be true by hands on experience and fact finding study. We can speculate, reiterate, opine on clandestine politics and military matters and even, like your statement indicates, .....pontificate through problematic promiscuous poo namely the leftist agendized media. The bottom line is that to imagine truth or find the truth are two different matters and using your resources in the quest for truth is.....unimaginable.
Here is a link that goes with this.... https://original.antiwar.com/mcgovern/2018/07/15/memo-to-the-president-ahead-of-mondays-summit/
I think we mostly agree that this is BS no major hacking took place and the DNC server was kept out of the way, not to be examined by the FBI who has been on Hilary's side all through this.
Podesta's password was "password" and, for that matter, he stupidly gave it to someone during a phishing attempt, which is not hacking. Hillary destroyed her servers and the DNC never allowed anyone to view their servers so I don't know what evidence they could have of Russian hacking. I am sure they tried to influence our elections, as we have influenced other foreign elections, but we know for a fact that our own intelligence agencies have interfered with the 2016 election and have been trying to overturn the results of that election.