Could it be vengeance? I believe this will explain Christine Blasey - Ford going after Brett Kavanaugh
I think it's clear to most people that there's nothing to this, even to most of those who want it to be true, but it may well work. Anti-Trump Republicans like Flake, Corker, Collins and a couple of others, are just looking for a reason to vote down anyone Trump nominates, and this could give cover for Democrats in conservative states to vote with their party. At some point, people will get fed up with the same tactics, but they seem to be working so far. I think there is a corral of Democrats for hire, willing to point the finger at whoever they're told to point the finger at.
I had read the same thing about the foreclosure. It appears to be Anita Hill all over again. How sad that the Democrats (and Collins, Murkowski and the lot) are willing to stoop this low.
Probably, before the next hearings, they will either have come up with a lying witness or two or else they'll pull some other pointing finger out of the corral. Lying to take down a Democrat is a badge of honor in the Democrat Party.
This is a Q post from yesterday Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.253 Sep 17 2018 19:33:16 (EST) PANIC IN DC D's offering to [KILL] sexual assault allegation v Judge K in exchange for immediate pullback of DECLAS. POTUS: Judge K will be confirmed regardless… Q
Given that what the Dems are offering is to stop pursuit of a lie, that doesn't seem like a good deal because they can always make up another lie, but I can understand the temptation to have it done with. If there is any truth to this, what I hope he does is to agree to anything, let them confirm Kavanaugh, and then declassify the documents. That may be acting in bad faith but so is making up last-minute lies.
It may all be true. Anita Hill was probably right. I hope Cavanaugh is not confirmed because of his beliefs and his record and because Trump appointed.
Anita Hill was made up , just as the latest Kavanaugh accusations probably are. The story has changed and she isn't even sure where it took place. She apparently told her therapist that there were 4 boys involved, then two, both of which deny that it happened. If it truly did occur, I would think should would at least remember where it occurred. Also, was she the only girl at a drinking party with 4 teenaged boys? What was she inviting?
One thing I find troublesome is that Feinstein had the letter since July and waited until just days before confirmation to make it public. If she believed that there was any truth to it, why not go public before the hearings and let Judge Kavanaugh have a chance to face his accuser?
I don't know if it's true or not (of course, that's the case with most of what we read in the news today), but I am hearing that Feinstein didn't bring it up because she had received an earlier letter from the same woman who was accusing Gorsuch of something similar. Whether that's the case or not, I don't think Feinstein believes it, but that wouldn't stop her from using it after the other attacks had failed. The sad thing is that truth matters so little today.
If it's a lie, that woman should be severely punished. She has attempted to tarnish the reputation of a decent, honorable man. For something that she alleges happened when they were teenagers, for God's sake!!!!!