my late father N law and I went. i was down there on one of many business trips. they have the sniper window blocked off with Plexiglas. we stood at the window next to it. first thing we noticed was distance between his gun and that limo was NOT that far away. we were always told it took an expert sniper to make the shot. they claim 3 shoots in 6 secs. can't be done. we thought yes it can. who was holding the stop watch??? duh. some people said more than than 3 but we found out that Dealey Plaza is enclosed and sounds echo off those buildings. people were looking all around for the direction of these shots. also the high percentage shot was where the limo turned left in front of the building. percentage. 100%. instead he waits for the turn and now the limo moves away. percentages began to fall but still not that hard of a shot. and he had a scope. the magic bullet debunked. why did they take so long here??? conspirators claimed no way the shot comes from the rear. turns rt then left and into John Connally's back. here's what really happened. at the 3:05 mark ive never so far seen any solid evidence that other shooters were involved. so until then ill go with the lone shooter. IMO. BTY the Dallas PD really screwed the pooch here. they let Oswald walk out the front, get into a cab and drive off. and allowed Ruby to enter a high security area.
forgot to mention. on my trip home we stopped in Oklahoma City to see the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building that was bombed. but that's another story
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/10/2...al-new-info-surrounding-presidents-death.html It's time to bring this tread up again since now they are releasing many of the JFK file documents and we might learn more about what really happened to JFK. Trump is still holding back some files because he says they could be a threat to National Security. I wonder if that has anything to do with Cuba? https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-archives-release-secret-jfk-files/798788001/ This article definitely mentions the goings on against Cuba.
I am not sure that we will learn a lot more from the release of the government files on the Kennedy assassination. Even if President Trump releases all of the files they have, it might be that no one in the government ever actually uncovered what truly happened, or if someone did, it was not allowed to be put into the government files. Especially if there is anything in there that might threaten our national security, that can not be released; and the truth undoubtedly does contain information that might not be good to make public, especially if it did point to President Johnson, or President Bush Senior as being involved with the assassination and subsequent cover-up. There is just NO way that any of that would be released, even if they know it is true; so I do not expect that we will see any surprising information coming out of this release of information.
Do I think we will ever learn the real truth about who really killed Kennedy and who was behind his asassinatin? I don't think so. But we will learn more about what was going on that they didn't tell us and that is interesting to me. I pretty much know what I believe really happened and it isn't that Oswald was the JFK's killer in my opinion. It would be nice if everyone would tell the real truth because there are lots of people to me who do know it. The truth would only make a difference as far as people involved who could be prosecuted...it won't bring JFK back for sure.
I was in law enforcement in Dallas when the Warren Commission tried to recreate the shooting with same rifle and live ammo, they could not do it, neither could we at our range. Aside from that I had a young officer they needed a ride home that day so I took him his father was a very high ranking FBI agent in Dallas I met him at the door taking his son home and told him what I saw that day, then asked 'there just had to be more than 1 shooter' he never said a word. When I was leaving he thanked me for bringing his son home and said """"THERE WAS"" not another word. I took that as the answer to my question.
Jack Anderson (the renowned columnist of Vietnam days) had the most credible "conspiracy theory" on the Kennedy assassination I have ever read. I don't recall the name of the document, but he had a lot of things documented that have never been released by the government and probably never will be. He documented a number of secret meetings of CIA officials, Cuban officials, and Mafia insiders at various places around the U.S., mostly in Florida. A summary is that it was a Mafia/CIA operation and Oswald was set up to take the fall. That sounds like many other theories. The background, however, is Cuba nationalized Mafia-run casinos ~1960, Kennedy was elected largely due to election fraud engineered by his father using Mafia contacts, and there was a plan by the Kennedy brothers to reduce the power of the CIA and withdraw the U.S. from Vietnam. Kennedy had allowed the Bay of Pigs to go forward and had tried several times to have Castro assassinated. The theory was that Castro decided to "return the favor" and contacted the Mafia. He allegedly contacted the Mafia and offered to reimburse them for the confiscated casinos if they engineered a hit on Kennedy. The Mafia, already feeling betrayed; they engineered his election and were rewarded by a full-on attack by the Justice Department under his brother. The Mafia allegedly contacted the CIA through mutual operators, and engineered the entire thing with the full support and knowledge of Johnson on the condition that he leave Cuba alone, carry on the conflict in Vietnam, and stop the attack on Organized Crime. Supposedly, a team of shooters were used and Oswald was paid to assassinate the President by the CIA and would be rewarded by becoming a CIA operative. Oswald was, of course, himself assassinated by Ruby who was then killed in his jail cell to wrap things up. If you get a chance to read the entire document, it is tied together nicely and is the most plausible theory I have ever read. The Mafia then sent boats to Cuba to retrieve the gold and cash probably supplied by the USSR as payment for the Cuban Missile Crisis embarrassment.
Ask yourselves which one individual stood to gain the most from the Kennedy assassination. And, I believe he did..... Frank
Everyone is familiar with the Warren Commission Report, which concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald assassinated President Kennedy, and was the sole shooter, and that Jack Ruby assassinated Oswald, also as a sole shooter. Not as many people are aware that a second investigation was conducted in, I think it was 1976, and that this investigation concluded that JFK's assassination was the result of a conspiracy among unknown individuals. Although this determination was not classified information, much of the information garnered was, and our media has mostly ignored the results, while the Warren Commission Report is generally acknowledged as the final word on the subject. The phrase "conspiracy theory" was invented by the government as a reference to any theories other than the official government theories, and has since been applied to anything that disagrees with the government's position on any topic. By law, all documents pertaining to the JFK assassination were supposed to have been unclassified after everyone personally involved with the assassination was dead, or fifty years after the date of the assassination. That time has come and gone yet, while President Trump was initially resolved to comply with this law and release these documents, he was persuaded by newly appointed CIA Director Mike Pompeo to not do that. Seemingly, President Biden's Administration is likewise not going to comply with this law. On Tucker Carlson's 12/15/22 show, he said that he received information from someone within the CIA who has access to these documents and has read them, that the CIA was involved in the assassination of President Kennedy. This will be no surprise to some of us, while others will continue to believe the Warren Commission Report.
It sounds like the Jack Anderson theory was correct. It was a conspiracy among the CIA, Mafia, and Castro with help and knowledge from Johnson. They just don't want us to know how corrupt the American government was and continues to be.
Tucker Carlson gets on my nerves. A self-appointed Authority on All Matters with an annoying voice inflection.
In such situations, I try to remind myself that it's the message, not the messenger, that should get my attention. It seems his source said "Yes" to CIA involvement but then qualified the answer by saying "I believe they were involved", which are two different things.
Kennedy was going to reduce the power of the CIA to perhaps avoid such a consequence. The CIA got to him first, with complicity from other entities. Of course, Kennedy was no stranger to ordering the assassination of other heads-of-state, and had had several presidents or other countries killed, most notably Lumumba of the Congo if I recall correctly. He also made several failed attempts on Castro's life.