Corona Virus A Deep State Play

Just as a suggestion, Martin. If you gave us a little more information about what was in the videos that you post, I think more people would watch them. Maybe not but, speaking for myself, there are so many things that people are saying on Youtube channels and elsewhere, and I don't want to spend my time watching most of it, particularly since so much of it seems, to me, to be nuts. That is not my opinion on this particular video, largely because I haven't watched this video, but people post videos for me on Facebook all the time, and I don't usually watch them and, when I do, I often wish I hadn't wasted my time. Again, this might be an insightful video but unless I have a good reason to watch it, I probably won't.

The same is true, although to a lesser extent, of links to newspaper, magazine, or blog articles - a lesser extent because I can control the amount of time that it takes me to read or to skim through an article, while videos take as long as they take. Even then, when posting any links to outside resources, it's a good idea to make the point that you want to make, either in your own words or by quoting a portion of the source, then give the source for those who want additional information. I don't always do that myself, and I am not saying this by way of admonishment or anything of the sort, but as a suggestion that might lead to more people actually following the suggested links.

 

As long as we're spending all of our waking hours worrying about the virus, I thought it might make some sense to consider this particular conspiracy theory that is floating around since it speaks to our particular segment of the population. Given that most of the governments of the world, including the United States, have a large degree of socialized or government-paid healthcare, and that the Wuhan strain of the coronavirus reportedly affects the sick and the elderly, and not the very young, which is generally the case with such diseases, could it be that the virus was designed to reduce the cost of healthcare and general living expenses for those populations who are no longer productive to society?

Think of how much money the United States government could save in Social Security, Medicare, and insurance if the chronically ill and the elderly were killed off, while the elderly elite and the wealthy would receive treatment for the disease.

Even for those of us who have our own insurance plans, we're at the stage in our lives where we're likely to be costing our insurance companies more than we're paying them, and those of us who are on Medicare or Medicaid are not only having our healthcare needs met by the government, but we're receiving Social Security payments as well, and some of us are also receiving subsidies for food through various welfare programs that we might qualify for through reduced income levels.

Those of us who are Americans would like to believe that our government would never do such a thing, but can we be sure that, if not conducted as an official act of the federal government that some factions within the government might not have put such a plan into action? Don't forget that Obama famously stated that it might make sense for the elderly to be given a pill to alleviate pain rather than to be treated for their illnesses.

If so, this would be a global plan rather than one undertaken by the United States alone, but how often have we been told that we live in a global world, driven by a global economy? Could it be that this global economy has determined that it could no longer afford to support useless eaters?

In case you aren't familiar with that term, "useless eaters" is a term that was used by former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who complained that there were too many useless eaters consuming valuable resources that would be better used by a reduced world population. I could be wrong, but I think that Henry Kissinger borrowed the term from Adolf Hitler.

Let me point out that Mr. Kissinger, who was born in 1923, does not consider himself to be a useless eater.

If there is truth to this conspiracy theory, it wouldn't be a Republican-Democrat thing, nor would it be a uniquely US thing, but a global conspiracy.

 

@Nancy Hart, I heard that too but I wasn't sure of the source.

 

I have read about that theory, and it goes along with the Georgia Guidestones and Bill Gates wanting to delete enough people to get the world population down to a much lower level. I can see several reason why the elderly would be the first ones chosen. Since most of us no longer have jobs, and live on some kind of a pension, and also many of the older population have serious health problems that cost a lot of money, it makes us a logical choice.
The other thing that I have thought about, is that we (at least here in America) are maybe the last generation to have and truly appreciate our freedom and independence. As we have observed, our veterans fought to keep this country free, and todays young people march in protest because they want a socialist government that they think will give them everything free with out them needing to work for it.
I think that the Deep State might very well have planned to do just that, plus they wanted to make Trump look bad and more likely to lose the election.

However, since I follow the Q-anon facebook groups, which is made up of many veterans, and people who support President Trump, they have a whole different opinion on what the outcome of this pandemic will be. Regardless of what the deep state intended for it to accomplish, the Q-anon groups are saying that our president has outsmarted the deep state and will use this to help the American people.
The quarantine will keep most people at home, and safe from any deep state attacks (like school shootings—no school), and thanks to the TP panic, most people have also bought at least some supplies to go through the quarantine time period.
Here is one of the posts about how this might all go down and then have a positive outcome for most of the people here, and everywhere in the world.

 

Those are some excellent points, Yvonne.