@Shirley Martin Being old provides additional "cover". Being "covered" does not guarantee anonymity. Having anonymity allows furtive movement. Furtive movement provides exciting ground for old dudes. Frank
So, basically, what you are saying is that you want to go back just so that you can prove Matrix was right ? I am failing to see the logic in that reasoning, @Frank Sanoica .
As far as I know I'm not Banned from S.F , but I did stop posting for quite a while. Some of the criticism on certain threads was well over the top.it didn't appear to be very democratic. i have been back recently and nosed around a bit and i don't think much has changed .
I tell you somebody else that I wonder if he will go back, Az-Jim. He was a crotchety old fart but he was never dull. I had stopped going there when he was banned so I don't know why he was banned. Does anybody know how to let him know that he is un-banned?
I know he's on a political forum. Did you see where I post awhile ago he had a heart attack? He's fine now.
No, I didn't see that. I'm glad he's OK in spite of the fact the we were polar opposites politically. he probably had a heart when Hillary lost the election.
Haha! I just looked on that forum and he hasn't posted in about 2 days I think ...he was usually on everyday. http://thepoliticalforums.com/threads/87437-No-pardon-for-Arpiao-announcement
That is EXACTLY why I was giving you such a hard time about saying that, @Frank Sanoica ! I just batted the ball back into your court.....
@Shirley Martin I must respectfully state to you that "games" are not a part of my play. No "Karvival Hocus-Pocus", as Bela Lugosi said, "Theese eese Reele!" Frank