Freedom Of Speech

Discussion in 'Politics & Government' started by Hedi Mitchell, Jul 28, 2019.

  1. Bess Barber

    Bess Barber Veteran Member
    Task Force Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2019
    Messages:
    3,760
    Likes Received:
    7,604
    In reading this, it was the first time I realized enough slander and libel on a politician CAN cause them a great amount of damage or a job loss.
    I'm surprised they don't hide behind the law on this point in keeping people from saying things that are untrue. Regardless of whether I like a particular candidate or person in office, I think untrue statements against that person (or their families) is totally wrong.
     
    #16
    Beth Gallagher likes this.
  2. Ken Anderson

    Ken Anderson Senior Staff
    Staff Member Senior Staff Greeter Task Force Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2015
    Messages:
    25,486
    Likes Received:
    45,664
    Under the law, we have a greater amount of freedom when it comes to slander or libel against a politician or another public figure than when the victim is not in the public sphere.
     
    #17
    Frank Sanoica and Bess Barber like this.
  3. Rene Descartes

    Rene Descartes Very Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2019
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    154
    Politicians expect it, and where they come out on top is pushing the person to prove it, or disproving that person. With the media as it is, they will usually jump on something to see if it is true. If politicians sued everyone who lied about them, that would tarnish them as well. There's an unwritten rule to leave the kids and spouses out of it, so when someone crosses that line, they usually get a trial by public.
     
    #18
    Nancy Hart likes this.
  4. Ken Anderson

    Ken Anderson Senior Staff
    Staff Member Senior Staff Greeter Task Force Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2015
    Messages:
    25,486
    Likes Received:
    45,664
    The United States (and other countries) are rapidly being indoctrinated into supporting freedom from speech rather than freedom of speech. This, of course, is a political agenda designed to empower the elite and disempower everyone else, yet those who would be among the everyone else are increasingly supporting this agenda. That's where the indoctrination comes in. While this is more vocal among the younger generations, who have been subjected to a larger degree of indoctrination, and from a younger age, than some of us who are older, it isn't restricted to young people. There are plenty of adults, even senior adults, who simply cannot tolerate hearing anything that might make them reconsider their worldview.

    Rather than examining their worldview closely enough to be able to support it, they don't believe that anyone should be allowed to say anything that they disagree with. US universities and secondary schools are the main base for censorship of thought, but it has found its way into local, state, and certainly, the federal government, enforced by police departments and, all too often, ratified by the courts.
     
    #19
    Last edited: Sep 2, 2023

Share This Page