Clinical trial data is publicly available and there were minimal adverse reactions. What’s more, they got their money up front, one of the other reasons things moved so quickly, so the financial incentive for fraud seems to be missing. IF, it can proved they conducted fraudulent clinical trials, for whatever reason, then they could no doubt be bankrupted because of it. However, this just reeks to me of MSM sensationalism. I no longer believe anything the MSM puts out unless they can reference the actual published scientific data, conspicuous by its absence in way too many cases.
Animal experiments are referred to as “preclinical studies” and are required to be completed before entering phase 1 of clinical trials. Here’s a nice graphic showing timeline, participants, etc., of Pfizer’s final phase 3 clinical trials. https://www.pfizer.com/science/coronavirus/vaccine/about-our-landmark-trial Here’s the clinical protocol for anyone that wants to wade through all this. https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf This is the clinical trial information for Moderna’s vaccine as summarized by the MIH. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/new...wed-report-moderna-covid-19-vaccine-publishes This describes how development was done so quickly. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/03/how...a-covid-vaccine-so-quickly-noubar-afeyan.html
Pfizer is admitting that they are conducting gain-of-function research, creating variants of the Covid virus, but they'd rather call it something else, all of which makes me wonder if they've hired Dr. Fauci.
I think researchers can find all kinds of reasons to justify that kind of research. I don’t think though that everything that can be justified should be undertaken. Some things just need to be left alone even if one can dream up good reasons for poking at them.