So far as his wealth goes, I was referring to all the companies who are throwing money at him to use their products. Most certainly, his visit with the hair sniffing guy in the oval office didn’t hurt his career. I guess there are folks out there who subscribe to his nonsense on Tik-Tok but many of us see him as a result of what other sites have to say about him. I think the entire on-line staff of The Daily Wire has thrown more than a few of his videos out there for commentary which is where I caught his “act”. Do note: I truly do believe he’s just a gay performing actor who seems to have found his niche.
I think he was calling himself gender neutral, the owner was having none of that rubbish! Lol (. ❛ ᴗ ❛.)
Regarding Budweiser's hiring of Brian Mulvaney... Each Budweiser brand has its own VP of Marketing. Vice President of Marketing for the Bud Light brand is Alissa Heinerscheid. Bud Light sales have been in decline. Her strategy is to promote the brand to “young beer drinkers”, but in the process smears her existing customers as “fratty and out of touch.” Bud Light no longer wants the business of such troglodytes. That's a funny way to "build," but I'm no marketing guru. Here's a brief video of her chat. It's depressing to hear the VP of Marketing for an internationally recognized brand with $5 billion in sales say she has a "super-clear mandate" to "evolve and elevate" the brand, which to her means "inclusivity." Oh...and "representations is sort of at the heart of evolution." I'm sure Darwin would agree (well, not really.) It makes sense that this basket of modern post-adolescent corporate gobbledygook thinks that a "transgender" will appeal to both men and women (as opposed to neither men and women.) And I guess you do save money when a single spokesperson represents both sexes...or maybe neither sex. It is not super-clear.
Also, see this post… http://seniorsonly.club/threads/the...e-complying-with”wokeness”.22640/#post-679271
I saw her video yesterday and the first thing I noticed was the childlike crayon drawing of a rainbow on her back wall. Now, whether that was “mama’s precious little kindergartener’s” drawing, no one will probably ever know but it did set the stage for her entire agenda. What kinda gets me is that beer is best known to be a part of a man’s world. Granted, women do drink beer but using a giddy actor portraying a girl (?) isn’t the best market ploy to interest either sex much more so a real man.
Budweiser needs to stick to their business... making beer. They can just have the Clydesdales prancing around and everybody's happy. (Except those 12 crybaby cross-dressers and a few animal-rights activists who don't like beer but have an agenda.) I will be interested to see Bud Light's quarterlies after this.
She's talking about making Bud drinkers out of the her generation. You need to lower your sights. edit to add: the first thing any business of that size does with a new VP is send them to Finishing School. She is an embarrassment. edit#2: Someone on another forum said that she has 3 kids. She does not come across as being that old/mature.
The Clydesdales were supposed to make appearances at several events in Missouri this week, but because of all the vitriol that Bud's created, Bud cancelled the horses and is keeping a low profile. Story here
Dunno why. All of the Budweiser Clydesdales are gelded and at least 4 years old so that kinda sorta fits in with the narrative.
I wonder how much endocrine disruptors factor into this. It doesn't take a large quantity to jigger one's system, and they are found in food, water, and the air. They can be consumed or absorbed through the skin.
I have wondered about that a lot myself. Micro- and nano-plastic pollution is off the charts, in everything and every living creature. It’s no stretch to imagine chemical effects from all that crap.
Do you really believe that gender reassignments are the result of plastics, or is this just an attempt to take the thread off-topic?
No, I wouldn't derail stuff. I've read many opinions that this may be a contributing factor. Apparently endocrie disruptors have been responsible for lowered sperm counts and lower testosterone in men. There is also lowered fertility and higher testosterone in women. Maybe I should have put it in another "trans" thread, since this is not directly tied to the destructive forces who are pushing this stuff.