Here in part is Snopes take on the Jon Rockefeller Creed he text is supposedly written from the perspective of some ominous insider of this shadowy group. But it was not written by Rockefeller. And in all likelihood, this text was not written by anyone with a connection to a global group of world-controlling elites. This text comes from an anonymous email that was posted to a banking website back in 2002. The above-displayed text has been online for nearly two decades. One hint that it was not penned by Rockefeller is that it mentions a number of modern inventions that were not widespread or didn't exist during Rockefeller's life, which ended in 1937. For example, this text mentions "video games," but the first video game, "Pong," wasn't invented until two decades after Rockefeller's death.
When the deep state is exposed they attack the source not the facts. Is that what we are doing it is all bitchute fault. No bitchute and others exposed the virus scam turning the common cold into a pandemic and exposing laptops when the MSN was calling it Russian dis information. Attack the messenger.
Exactly! There is propaganda on both sides, but one is sanctioned and driven and rewarded by the government, and the other is denounced by the same sources that proclaim the government's views. There is often dis-or mis-information on both sides.
Like Wikipedia, Snopes cannot be relied upon for accuracy when it comes to anything that even remotely touches on politics Actually, I don't trust Snopes on anything. Most often, the fact-checkers are in business to push an agenda.
Alex Jones { personally don't like him] has been banned almost every where. 90% or more of what he says in time works out to be true. Like shooting the messenger might be the wrong thing to do. I put all information in a folder in my mind labeled interesting and the minute I can verify it gets accepted as true.
Alex Jones says things before people are willing to accept them, and that's the main reason that people find him to be obnoxious and untrustworthy. Even after he is proven to have been correct, it has already been imprinted in people's minds that he was wrong. Another thing that comes with being one of the first to report on something is that he is sometimes wrong. Given that he is usually accused of being wrong, even the majority of the time when he is reporting facts, the labels stick to him while people are willing to excuse the agenda-driven falsehoods of the mainstream media.
Snopes isn't any less trustworthy than any other so called fact finder. I was trying to show that Rockefeller,never said that or that anyone can prove it. @Martin Alonzo - I am not picking on you and I know your hearts in the right place. For me - Unless I personally see,hear,feel, whatever or whomever it is - I do not trust nor believe. Having said that... even in myself it is questionable.
Snopes is run by very progressive folks and has been shown to have a very "liberal" slant, so it cannot be trusted to give an impartial interpretation or judgement on political matters.