... not sure what I'm looking at. Isn't that just a sweep second hand poised momentarily at Mickey's crotch? I don't have to be convinced about Disney. I've seen single frames of his animated cartoons showing pubic hair up a girl's dress and many more egregious examples. I don't know what you've found here.
I was on another site where someone had a screen shot of a "Tweet" about this with vague reference to the hands position of 10/2 (October 2nd), as though something is going to happen on that date. But all ads for analog watches display this time because of its symmetry.
I see it now. The ray that goes from between his legs to 6 o'clock terminates at the Mickey Mouse logo, making it look like his male part is dangling. There is nothing on the web about this. And goodness know what that hour hand does at 6 o'clock.
I'm a hard-sell when it comes to conspiracies. And call me weird, but Mickey's Dickey isn't on my radar.
They are already starting to push pedophilia as a natural part of some people, just like they have done with the transgender acceptance and pushing transgender people into the limelight.
Quoting from one of the above article titles ( which uses the original spelling of the word ): "Not all paedophiles are bad people..." If you define a potential paedophile as one who has the urges but doesn't follow through with them, that is one thing - forgivable. If you define a paedophile as one who acts out his proclivities on innocent children, then yes, all paedophiles are bad people.