The virus is not a hoax. I had COVID-19 and that is a fact. However, it has been proven that many people who have died vis a vis an auto accident or something of that order and tested positive after death, it is counted as a COVID death. That is ethically wrong and as far as I am concerned criminal.
@Beth Gallagher Yes the word might have been a Freudian slip meaning the word graph and printing graft. sometimes both fit.
In the past few months, I have had a cold a couple of times. I rarely go anywhere where there are other people. I don't wear masks regularly when I do go anywhere but, since I have caught a cold a couple of times, it's quite likely that I would have caught the other coronavirus that everyone is so worried about if it were lurking about. For that matter, maybe I have, since I didn't see a doctor about my cold symptoms but, if so, it felt like the common cold that most people get two or three times a year. My nutrition is good and I take a few supplements to build up my immune system, so I'm no more concerned about COVID-19 than I am about the seasonal flu that I don't vaccinate against. It could happen. Probably not. If it does, I'll probably get through it okay. I'm good. I had the flu a few years ago, but I didn't see a doctor about that either. It wasn't any fun but I survived it.
The normal flu season will be starting again soon and if it is passed off as covid like it has been. You will see another panic and probably another lock down. This is getting to be a real game of the controllers. They control money through banking system. They control food supply though Monsanto/Bayer and GMO seeds. They control medicine through the WHO, CDC, AMA. and all the other associations. They control the media through 6 corporations and the internet through banning and censorship. The justice system by bias judges and prosecuting lawyers some people walk free as others are jailed for nothing.
I follow Jon Rappoport I watched his work. He is a very good medical reporter most time a way ahead of the medical fraud. He puts out reports on medical science that no one will report. Showing in their own documents the fraud they put out. Oct22by Jon Rappoport by Jon Rappoport October The virus that isn’t there22, 2020 (To join our email list, click here.) Recently, I’ve written a series of articles revealing that the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is unproven. I’ve quoted key CDC and study documents that confess “the virus is unavailable.” Which is like an ice company saying they have no access to water. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] I’ve published quotes from Dr. Tom Cowan’s major article [6] exposing how CDC journal authors “assemble” the idea of a virus from cobbled sequences they ASSUME are parts of SARS-CoV-2. (Below, I reprint my article on Dr. Cowan’s shocking findings.) Now, I want to make overall comments on the con, the game, the hustle. The public, and most medical professionals, are awed by the whole concept of genetic sequencing. They accept the process as a holy of holies. If researchers in their lab claim they’ve “sequenced the virus,” the virus must exist. How else could its genetic structure have been discovered? Of course, the virus doesn’t have to exist at all. We are talking about an illusion. Stage magic. And if we could force him to explain his trick, the magician would say: “Notice, I begin with a fragment of RNA I assume is part of a larger new virus. My assumption isn’t proven. I simply make the claim.” “Then I lay out the genetic structure of that little piece of RNA, and I discover I need a great more genetic information to fill out the sequence of the whole virus.” “That’s not really a discovery. I already knew I’d need much more. The question is: where am I going to get that added information?” “The answer is: from data bases. These bases contain miles of sequences that have already been established—rightly or wrongly. Sequences of other viruses.” “Which sequences do I choose? I make guesses. I make assumptions. Actually, I choose according to a story line that has already been laid down. In this case, a story about a member of the coronavirus family. That’s right. I always knew what I was going to look for. In fact, that initial piece of RNA I began with? I could have selected all sorts of other pieces of RNA, but I chose that one because it seemed to be from the coronavirus family.” “Does this whole business sound like a Lego or tinker-toy operation? Well, it is. I never have a physical specimen of the virus. I never isolate the purported virus from all the material that surrounds it. I just assume or pretend the virus is in there.” “Anyway, I now select all sorts of genetic sequences from the huge database. And I hook the sequences together, AS IF they were already connected and real and waiting for me to find them. They weren’t, but I pretend they were.” “That pretense is the key. It’s like selling a sucker a map leading to a lost silver mine. There was never a map. The con artist cobbled it together from pieces of other old maps of a territory in the mountains of Colorado. The map looks real. It looks whole. But it was never whole.” “THE GENETIC SEQUENCE OF THE VIRUS is that map. It’s made to look like a one long code that was there all along. But it wasn’t. It isn’t.” “Every good magic trick works this way. The magician makes the audience believe he is performing one smooth operation. But he isn’t. He’s taking all sorts of detours. He’s reaching into his sleeve and pulling out a card. He’s palming that card so no one sees it. He’s slipping the card into the deck in his other hand. And all the while, he’s talking confidently and making other gestures to distract the audience.” “The whole purpose of the trick is to inspire awe. In the lab, the same principle applies. The researchers SEEM to find one long genetic sequence of the whole virus. Astonishing.” “But that’s not what happened. Not by a long shot.” “And notice one other very important thing. In the lab, we are actually piecing and cobbling together the pattern—the code—of a virus. We don’t have to deal with actual genes. What we do is all on the level of IDEATIONAL construction. We’re hooking up DATA. So that’s another level of the trick. We’re not stringing together pieces of material. We’re stringing together pieces of data from genetic databases. This would be like standing on stage in front of an audience and doing a very clever card trick without having a deck of cards in the first place. Now THAT’S a trick for the ages.” With all this I mind, read my previous article on Dr. Tom Cowan’s shocking discoveries: Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense —Cowan analyzes yet another key document posted by the CDC, in their journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases: “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States”— by Jon Rappoport October 19, 2020 The hits keep coming. The CDC used an arbitrary computer “tinker-toy” process to invent a description of the virus. The virus that no one has proven exists. This is the basic conclusion of Dr. Tom Cowan. The CDC article [7] was discovered by Sally Fallon Morrell. Her co-author, Dr. Cowan, fleshes out the fraud. Cowan’s article is titled, “Only Poisoned Monkey Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’.” [6] Dr. Cowan: “[The CDC journal article] was published in June 2020 [original publication, March 2020]. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.” “First, in the section titled ‘Whole Genome Sequencing,’ we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.” In other words, the sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was done by assumption and arbitrary inference. If this is science, a penguin is a spaceship. Cowan: “To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.” “The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘consensus,’ sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary ‘unicorn,’ so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.” As I’ve been stating [5], the “discovery” of the “new virus” was actually the foisting of a PRE-DETERMINED STORY ABOUT A VIRUS. Nothing real or believable about it. But once the official pattern is laid down, others follow it dutifully. Dr. Cowan uncovers more insanity in the CDC journal article. Using the ASSUMED new virus, in an UN-ISOLATED STATE, the researchers try to prove it is harmful by injecting it on to several different types of cells in the lab: Cowan: “The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:” “’Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells [monkey cells]. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero [monkey] cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells [human cells] were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection’.” “What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible ‘hosts’ or models on which they can test…” “The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.” “The shocking thing about the above [CDC journal] quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.” “My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.” So first…use a process of genetic sequencing that involves concocting, out of an arbitrary computer program… The existence and structure of the “new virus”… And then, taking a soup that the researchers claim contains the virus, in an un-isolated state, inject the soup into several types of cells in the lab… And discover the prime target—human cells—are not infected by the imaginary virus. And after this good day’s work, walk away and pretend nothing odd or self-incriminating happened. And oh yes, lock down the planet based on this “science.” Naturally, we MUST take a toxic vaccine that prevents non-infection by the non-virus. SOURCES: [1] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/202...e-coronavirus-the-cdc-says-it-isnt-available/ [2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/09/covid-the-virus-that-isnt-there-the-root-fraud-exposed/ [3] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/202...-the-missing-study-the-secret-in-plain-sight/ [4] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/202...ng-virus-they-lied-and-locked-down-the-world/ [5] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/15/if-the-virus-isnt-there-why-do-they-believe-it-is/ [6] https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/ [7] https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
Sorry, but the virus absolutely DOES exist and a lot of people have died from it. Isn't Rappaport the guy peddling CDs about paranormal activity? He must be a medical expert.
The people who are telling you people are dying from it when there is no proof it exists. The CDC by there own studies say they do not have a copy of the virus. Also less people died from all causes in the US this year than other year. Where is the so called 200,000 people this virus killed?. .
Thankfully, I don't know anyone who died from the virus, but that doesn't make the ones who did any less dead. This topic is silly so I'm checking out of this discussion.
And how does all that relate to the "Chinese virus". Is Trump not right then? Can't be. But I agree with Beth: silly topic and a waste of (my) time.
That was the plan. Selling that story. Am I suggesting that many, many scientists, and even political leaders and globalist big shots knew, in advance, that no real virus would ever be discovered, that the sequencing would be a fake? Of course not. In every major covert operation, information is compartmentalized. In this particular operation, we have a stunning fact: almost everyone automatically believes the genetic sequencing and the virus are real. That goes for elite scientists as well. They’re in the dark. Only a very few are aware that the whole process of cobbling together the “new virus” is fraught with fraud. So, for all intents and purposes, “the virus” con is protected. It’s protected by institutionalized science. By massive consensus and massive ignorance. The situation is even more stunning than that. All over the world, there are scientists in labs of various kinds who believe they’re working with “the virus,” when they’re working with a cobbled-together IDEA of the virus. So, for the most part, in this COVID operation, the key players are only aware that researchers could arbitrarily choose one virus over another as the “cause of the pandemic.” They’re not aware that the choice is actually a fake virus. The choice of a new coronavirus was made for a simple reason. The diagnostic test would turn up huge numbers of false positives, thus jacking up case numbers and providing the rationale for the lockdowns and the economic devastation. Which were, all along, the real aims of the operation. To put in more specifically, the PCR test would register positive, because it was geared to detect genetic sequences commonly present in people all over the world. To put it still another way—the PCR test was pre-set with DATA which would “match” THE DATA extracted from patients. The fix was in. The virus was concocted out of data. It was and is data. The test was loaded with data that frequently matches the virus-data. Think of it this way. You have a map of a lost gold mine. It seems to chart a course through the mountains and valleys of California. Of course, the map is a fake. It was drawn and made to look old. You follow the map, and sure enough, in a remote mountain area, you arrive at a giant hole in the side of a hill. But the hole and the “mine” are fake, too. They’re a Potemkin Village. The tunnel and the braces and the struts were built recently. The “map” matches “the mine.” Fake leads to fake. In the digital age, any material thing can be digitized. The material thing is then represented by code. “Activate the code” and a virtual portrait of the thing pops up. But it’s just as easy to invent code for something that doesn’t exist. Or has never been proven to exist. Like SARS-CoV-2. Pure gold and pure garbage are made interchangeable. In the form of DATA. If you believe in science from the CDC they claim they do not have available a copy of the virus but they do have 37 base pairs that relate to the virus. That is 37 out of 30,000 which should be never proof of anything. That would be like finding a piece of key, a screw, and a shard of class in a farmers field and claim you know what car it came from. The PCR test is looking for these 37 base pairs and saying you have covid. How stupid do they think are? The CDC also admitted some PCR test that went to hospitals were infected. This probably why a Paw Paw fruit can test positive or someone who did not take the test proven positive. Sad to think that a multi trillionaire dollar business might give you false information to make a profit. Only poison monkey kidney cells were the only cells that would grow the virus. { not human cells] https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/
Do you honestly believe that countries would see their economy go down the drain Of course it exists and if people had complied we'd all be back to normal by now - crazy world !
One country who did not shut down is doing quite well with very little problem. {Sweden] If you say we should listen to them and the USA has more problems. Listen to what WHO it is not problem keep boarder open, Or Fauci who said you do not need masks. Did all these countries shut down for the swine flu that killed a lot more?