Yeah, when the government is in the business of lying to you, you're likely to find their message, true or not, on all the government sites, but these are nothing more than agenda sites. If you believe everything the government tells you, then you will find them credible. If you consider that maybe the government doesn't always tell you the truth, then you may not.
For most people, if it says something that they agree with, then it's a legit site. Otherwise, it's just another crackpot site. None of this makes for a useful argument, and it certainly doesn't qualify as a useful exchange of ideas. To the pro-vaxxers, anyone who disagrees with any aspect of a vaccination is a crackpot. Even the guy who literally invented mRNA vaccines has been removed from social media sites, and you can be sure the government and mainstream media sites won't be quoting him. The change in his credibility is restricted to one thing - he dared question the safety of the coronavirus vaccines. If you question the government on vaccines, you are deemed not credible, as far as government sycophants are concerned, so it should be no wonder that they never find credible sites questioning the government's vaccine edicts.
There may actually be hope on the horizon for a REAL vaccine if the "pandemic" lasts long enough: link
I can't help but think that if the current vaccinations are truly safe and effective, there wouldn't be such a moratorium on an objective discussion of the subject. If they have nothing to hide, the subject wouldn't be censored.
Most people are still unaware that the current vaccines have NOT been FDA approved, just released for "emergency use". The vaccine concept mentioned in the link is what I have been waiting for in the flu vaccine arena. A few stable epitopes have been identified for influenza, and if a vaccine could be developed using those, the flu vaccine would no longer be an annual affair, as it would be more like a tetanus shot.
That is also why they are so strongly discrediting reportedly effective treatments for Dr. Fauci's virus. Emergency use designation doesn't hold up when there is an effective treatment.
So far the virus to this day has not been isolated. So all tests looking for something that they have not isolated is impossible. This vaccine is made from information that came from the CCCP and that is the military part of the Chinese government. What could go wrong with that?
Its obvious the vaccines are not a cure all but they seem to sofen the blow for some. We may some day get one that works. Right now a hit and miss is all we've got, works for some maybe but not for others.
Sure. Hydroxychloroquine was one, but it was denounced since Trump mentioned it. I personally believe that the Delta variant was developed and released into the Indian population designed to bypass the susceptibility to hydroxychloroquine. I have no evidence for that, but it seems logical since the Indian military was whipping the Chinese on the northern border, and India had been hardly touched by Covid prior to that, as they are very common users of the drug as an antimalarial. The Chinese simply introduced a modified version of the virus to punish Inia for confronting China. All speculation, mind you, but logical to me. Anything that changes the intracellular pH is a prophylactic against Covid (and most viruses) and can be used in the early stages of infection. Steroids have been found to treat later-stage infections to ward off the cytokine storm and mediate acute phase reactants.
You also have to keep in mind that what may be effective for some people is never effective all people. Therefore the mentioned effective treatment isn't a cure all.