The trial is over! And the outside legal experts who participated in the NPR, AP, and CNN articles found no fault with the verdict of innocent. The point of this article is not to retry the whole trial, but to briefly present the objective opinions of outside legal experts after the fact.
and they that that by ignoring facts. Legal experts who are unbiased don't make statements that are incomplete. BTW NOBODY here has to be told that the Babylon Bee is not a news source.
His father and his grandparents lived in Wisconsin. I think the problem is that most people haven't watched the trial, although it was televised. Instead, they depend on their favorite newspaper, broadcast news, or news site to give them the information. That could work if we had something resembling objective news, or even an honest attempt at telling the truth. However, we don't have that. Instead we have, mostly, a whole string of Democrat progressive activists masquerading as the news, with no attempt at objectivity. So anyone who depended on MSNBC, CNN, CBS, The Washington Post, The New York Times, or 95% of the other mainstream media corporations in the country, for their news is going to believe that Kyle Rittenhouse illegally crossed the state lines with an assault rifle because he was a white supremacist who hated black people and wanted to kill as many people as he could, and that he then hunted people down and killed them. From one of the alphabet news agencies that I saw, I would have thought that Kyle was shooting black people, although no black people were shot. The fact that absolutely none of what someone may have learned about the case is true would be lost on them because that's what they were told by the news sources they trust, and they wouldn't believe the truth if it introduced itself to them. It's not an honest mistake either, because most of them are still repeating talking points that were proven to be incorrect during the course of the trial, which I would assume they were there for.
Since we ran out of decent movies to watch 'again' we kept up with this trial and the other one in Brunswick Georgia. Yet only this one is newsworthy or spoken of. This one at least had two sides where the Aumaud Arbery trail is total Kankaroo. Makes you wonder why none of the " preachers" aren't in the hoods protesting all the deaths of the blacks by other blacks. Go into the hoods of Chicago,San Fran, NYC Portland and stop the 1000's of black on black death's where your most needed. Seems the only black lives that matter are the few taken by cops or whites. Thats racist! ritenhouse did not kill a black person yet even the president calls him white nationalist.
I'm hoping that Rittenhouse's lawyers will follow through with filing lawsuits against the MSM and Biden. I wondered if Biden could be sued and found this tidbit... Although presidents are typically immune from civil lawsuits which take place during their time in office, presidents are not immune from suits that pertain to their actions from before taking office, like the infamous case of Paula Jones’s sexual harassment lawsuit against President Bill Clinton suggested. This means Biden could be sued by Rittenhouse.