I placed this thread here because this is not in the news but should be. If you accept that NATO is the military arm of The Great Reset then this action is an assault on the sovereignty of our country. ... not with a bang but a whimper - many small whimpers so we won't notice each one. If it's not on mainstream news then it isn't happening, right? https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-sovereignty-nato-takes-norfolk-naval-base/5756585 Trans-General Milly Miley presided over the transfer. A French general now commands Norfolk. This is not a joke.
Having a NATO joint forces command center at Norfolk is not the same thing as NATO taking control of the base.
I don't know it was ever in the news but one reason it might not be in the news now is that the story is from September 2021.
While searching for the law that says no foreign troops to deploy or be active on American soil, I also came across this about the born on American soil does not include illegals.' https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=ea39...XNvaWwtaXMtdGhlLWxhdy1vZi10aGUtbGFuZC0v&ntb=1 I'm still looking for the clause and its right in this act somewhere. https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=e88f...WFnZS1pbnRlbnQtYW5kLXdvcmQtbWVhbmluZ3Mv&ntb=1 Why Can’t Foreign Troops Occupy American Soil?—Answers Through Analysis of Constitutional Language, Intent and Word Meanings Published August 22, 2012 | By Daniel Vincent McGonigle III By Daniel V. McGonigle III
I don't see any reason for any troops in our nation, but then that was when we were a nation under laws, 'for the people and by the people'. We are no longer a nation now, so anything goes, I guess, but more a dictatorship..
Dwight you must not have seen the foreign troops doing maneuvers in Tampa and Miami Florida. They said it was training to enforce Mashall Law, and the foolish American crowds thought it was cool,they clapped and celebrated like it was the 4th of July.
INTERNATIONAL Special forces training for Marshall Law. Isn't Mashall Law basically for citizen uprising? skip thru the video, they are doing now too just a few months agio they were at it again. 2018 This one is 2014, In a more condensed volume than Story’s, the above is also confirmed by Thomas Cooley, LLD in his The General Principles of Constitutional Law in the United States of America (1880) http://www.constitution.org/cmt/tmc/pcl.htm Story’s 1833 Commentaries and others provided are a few of the available reliable sources confirming and verifying original intent and understanding. The Constitution and Laws place restrictions on an American standing army, never mind a foreign army. Foreign military conducting exercises in or on American soil, waterways or airspace is considered an invasion because military are equipped with standard supplies and weapons of War, and therefore would be an extreme security risk and potential “public danger”, never mind that Russian military is an historical enemy of America. During such exercises recently conducted, was the Militia called forth for security purposes, in foreseeing a remote but possible chance of foreign military conducting an actual attack instead of a fake or practice attack? With Militia maintained per the Constitution, there exists
How so? "The NATO command is the only Joint Force Command in North America. If deterrence fails, the mission of the command is to fight and win the Battle of the Atlantic." NATO takes over the mission of the U.S. Navy. 'Joint forces command' means NATO is running things.