The moderator made it sound as if there was nothing negative that could be said about Hillary, but that her husband was the only one with a negative history. That was shameful, but Trump didn't point out enough of her own scandals, in my opinion. It's not about her husband.
Chris Wallace is doing better than any other moderator from any of the other debates, but still giving the nudge to Hillary.
Trump, please explain that the president and the vice president do not have to be in complete agreement on everything. Where did we come to that idea, anyhow?
Chris Wallace is going to try to get Trump to pledge his support to Hillary if she should be proclaimed the winner in November. How did that work out for him in the primary?