My opinion; precious metals prices are headed for the stratosphere. Some of that price rise will be genuine and some will just reflect the super inflation that's inevitable as the dollar collapses. It will take discernment to see the proportion of each that applies. Tracking gold prices in other, more stable currencies will be edifying in that regard.
Especially if the BRICS countries succeed in instituting their new currency and taking down the dollar.
I just heard a rather encouraging view of things. Since the Left is not having children and aborting many of the potential children, the U.S. will shift to the right. This view assumes that we will be pushed aside by the New Order led by China, Russia and India rather than attacked and taken over. It is difficult to say, but people from the old Soviet Union are saying that we are looking now much like the USSR before it broke up. Nobody believed anything the government or the media of the time said. Some quotes from a famous Russian says it well: "If I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible what was the main cause of the ruinous revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: 'Men had forgotten God; that is why all this has happened.'" ~ Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn "The strength or weakness of a society depends more on the level of its spiritual life than on its level of industrialization. Neither a market economy nor even general abundance constitutes the crowning achievement of human life. If a nation's spiritual energies have been exhausted, it will not be saved from collapse by the most perfect government structure or by any industrial development. A tree with a rotten core cannot stand." ~ Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn "It's an universal law-- intolerance is the first sign of an inadequate education. An ill-educated person behaves with arrogant impatience, whereas truly profound education breeds humility." ~ Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn "The generation now coming out of Western schools is unable to distinguish good from bad. Even those words are unacceptable. This results in impaired thinking ability." ~ Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
One huge difference between us and the Soviet Union before it collapsed is the takeover of the country by third worlders who bring their own language and culture with them. The radical dems will be give them welfare, citizenship and the vote simply for being here and they will vote democratic because that is who gives them the freebies. Also, they will be here in such numbers as to force the adoption of Spanish as the main language in many places. They bring a culture of ignorance and excessive deference to authority that, beyond the language barrier is simply un-American. Despite what the schools and universities preach, some cultures are superior to others. I have no prejudice against illegals as a people or against their culture but I do prefer the old Anglo-Saxon insistence on personal freedom, responsibility, respect for law and borders. I understand how chauvinist that sounds but I'm not apologizing for it.
In contrast to the movies depicting the American people rising up to repel foreign invaders, most of the people in this country today are so indoctrinated to submit to authority that they will simply recognize whoever it was who took us over as the new authority and consider obedience to them to the patriotic thing to do, and they would rise up, instead, against those who had the courage to attempt to win back our freedom, considering them to be terrorists.
Fighting back "creates" conflict. We all know how some people hate conflict. If we just submit, then there will be no conflict. Makes me want to slap them and test their convictions.
I've heard similar theories driven by many causal issues. I wonder how often children outright adopt their parents' politics, how often they initially reject them in a short-term oppositional mode but they return, and how often they reject those politics for life. While this applies equally to both ends of the spectrum, there are lots of pressures outside of the parents' sphere of influence, and none of them are right-leaning or centrist.
Because this is the conspiracy group I can tell the truth. Trump said that there is a storm coming and no one knew what he was talking about. I guess they were thinking of weather. There is a group called Wagner Group they claim they are coming to liberate the England, Canada. and USA from the terrorist leadership. The name of the campaign is the storm. The Russian have through history came to the help of the USA but demonized by the USA https://rumble.com/v2a2qea-wagner-v...sa-from-genocidal-governments-who-are-us.html
I have heard opinions that instead of running for office again and fighting from within the system, Trump needs to be like Soros and influence it from outside, without any restrictions.
I think Trump is just a placeholder for now. My belief that JFK Jr or other. will make an appearance run for president and Trump will be a world representative most all countries like him S.A. made him king he gets a better response in other countries than any U.S leader.
Good thoughts but there’s one vast difference between Trump and Soros. It’s the guy who said, “go to the capital peacefully” that they’re trying to put in jail whilst the guy who paid into Antifa’s and BLM’s destructive antics is a hands off entity and highly praised by the left.
In my teens I studied this period of German history to try try to understand the origins of WW2. No doubt I've forgotten details bit I'm failing to see what new or newish conspiracy theory is being espoused here. Adolph Hitler was a mediocre personality who was helped into power by a combination of the money powers of Germany along with the intelligence agencies of the time. Anti-semitism was actually not that important in the Nazi movement except as a focal point of the Enemy along with the communists. There were many Jews in the ranks of the German army in WW1 as Hitler was well aware.. Power over people was the goal of the National Socialists.What's new about that? I'm missing something. I remember a tale that Hitler personally shot Rohm in the prison purge. Is that familiar to anyone? I have no idea if it's true.
Dwight Ward, I, too, read that Hitler personally shot Rohm. I think it was fabricated or a mistaken interpretation of something the writer had read. Other places said A.H. offered Rohm a pistol and left. Personal execution of someone planning a counter-revolution seems out of character. When later scandals arose, however angry they made Hitler (Baron Werner von Fritsch), and whatever extreme punishments the offenders said they were willing to accept (Werner von Blomberg), Hitler never so much as slapped a person who had scandalized Party, Military, or Church. (I may find in further reading that he did, though maybe more privately than U.S. General George Patton.) I actually have difficulty fully accepting that Hitler personally walked into a prison, into the cell of a suspected traitor, and handed him a pistol. Yet I have found no witnesses or arguments refuting it. The crazy "Gay Twenties".
Good comments. I guess we'll never know the full truth of things since history is written by the victors. I thought it odd that the SA became so powerful under Rohm and that he considered his own homosexuality healthy as opposed to the 'unhealthy' kinds. Germany was at the forefront of studying the various kinds of human sexuality but the Nazis put an end to that. With Rohm's death the SA was absorbed into the German army to the relief of many. I'd refer anyone to the works of Hannah Arendt for insights into the totalitarian mind.