The problem is always "What then?" If they provoke such actions, then nothing that is subsequently installed shall have legitimacy, and WE will be responsible for setting the precedent for Rule-by-Regime. There are other aspects to this that you and I agree on, but OPSEC and discretion must always prevail. This has yet to fully play out. There is lots of push-back against The Agenda at the state level, and I guarantee that we only see 10% of the resistance. I will say one thing that should not get us on anyone's radar screen: the Lone Wolf has always been identified as their highest threat...that is, a single guy with no family to worry about leaving and who has less to lose than most others. To the extent they believe this to be a legitimate concern...do they not understand that by destroying the institution of marriage and the institution of family that they have created more of the very thing they purport to view as a threat? I honestly believe they lack the smarts to think through their next bowel movement. When you own the global media and the vast majority of people still aren't buying your crap and brute force is all you can muster, you are less than formidable. And it is their owning most of The 5th Estate that contributes to their downfall...those idiots lack any introspection. They actually believe themselves to be intelligent because no one has the guts to tell the emperor that he/she is naked and the media perpetually covers for them as some spoiled entitled child. The kid rarely learns and usually self-destructs. Those at the very global top of this may be different, but there is only so much force available to them. Those who execute their orders are defective by the very nature of being "of a narcissistic kind" that would carry out such orders and think themselves to be "better."
I just read an article in American Thinker regarding an article in The Atlantic titled "How The Rosary Became an Extremist Symbol." Buncha wafer-eating crackers.
Hmmm…..okay but didn’t Nancy Pelosi break the Title 18 US Code 2071 by mutilating government documents when she tore up Trump’s State of the Union address? I mean, she was highly praised by the Dems and other Trump haters for the act.
Hell, what about Hillary getting a pass by claiming that the Secretary of State has the authority to declassify documents. But none of this matters. Truth does not come into play.
According to the video, she might have had that power but to be legal, she would have had to jump through all the hoops as laid out by Obama himself but…..she didn’t. I really, REALLY believe everyone in Washington is afraid of her.
It sounded as though they took everything Hillary did and put it into a search warrant against Trump. She even confessed to much of it but there was no raid on her home.
I think if she was the originator of the the document and the original classifier of such documents, it would be within her authority to declassify them, but much of what she dealt with on an unsecure server were the documents of others.
I listened to a reporter (or the like) a couple of years ago and he said that the then President Trump left a portion of his speech on the podium after some event. If I remember right, the reporter (or whatever) snagged the paper just as a piece of memorabilia and a Secret Service agent hunted him down and got the paper from him saying that it belongs to the Government. My question is this: Who the heck is the Government? Is that some near fantasy world that sits atop Mt. Olympus with it’s godly occupants claiming everything mankind does belongs to them? it’s a derned piece of paper and if Trump didn’t want it then it belongs to whomever grabs it.
I heard she keeps an Enemies Spreadsheet. It's insane. One would think if she had that much dope on such powerful people, her viewing in the Capitol should have happened a long time ago. From where does her power derive, and how does she stay protected?
The "government" has become the Administrative State", those bureaucrats who continue in their jobs regardless of who is elected. It mostly began with Roosevelt, but became much worse with the "Chevron Decision" or "Chevron Deference" that was decided in 1984. It basically made the bureaucrats the prosecutor, judge, and jury in all matters related to regulations. Since Congress has gotten so sloppy in their legislation, they write voluminous documents that nobody (except the bureaucrats) read, but omit any specifics on enforcement, etc., leaving all that decision-making to the bureaucrats. That way the elected officials can claim ignorance when the enforcement is unpopular. The Constitution gave all legislative power to Congress, but Congress has delegated it illegally/unconstitutionally to the Judicial and Executive branches. I understand that Chevron is going to be up for review in the upcoming Supreme Court session beginning in October and it might give us some hope for the future.