I don't view that as a problem. Beyond the standards that most people abide by, as human beings, I wouldn't want someone setting standards for parenthood. Especially not today, when the ones who would set the standards have no recognizable standards. There's the problem. Like most agents of the system, they seek more power over more people, and the system encourages it.
Adults were told by Jesus that they must both be born again and become infants or little children if they/we/ ever hope to see His Kingdom. All those who follow Jesus do as written accordingly, God's Way, "purify themselves because He is Pure".... (which also includes never keep continuing to sin willingly; rather choose to stop sinning, repent and turn towards the Creator away from sin) ========================================== Jesus says Become as Little Children To become as a little child means that we are no longer soul reliant, but have disconnected our mind from the soul and trying all those thoughts that rise up from the soul. That we have formed the true connection with the Father, in righteousness, trusting God to provide our daily needs because "he knows what we have need of, before we can ask.". unashamedofjesus.org › 2022 › 06 › 08 › matthew-18-become-as-little-children Matthew 18- Become As Little Children | Unashamed of Jesus Jun 9, 2022And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them, And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven. =========================================== btw, Jesus did not say all children are pure either - rather they are unclean unless at least one of their parents is clean/saved/redeemed..... not sure what specifically the original language and meaning is exactly , but children of unbelievers are unclean. Since the Apostles and disciples who follow/followed/ Him are/were immersed in Jesus Name were/are required to be becoming pure, this is God's Doing in those who believe in Him, who are called by His Name (not 'christians' btw), and called according to His Plan , and who love Him. Cleansed by the blood. Washed by the Creator's Word. "Made" clean, forgiven of all trespasses/sins/transgressions.
Now Eli Lilly--a $30Billion global pharmaceutical company headquartered in Indianapolis since 1876--is getting in on the act. On Friday (Aug 5th), Indiana enacted a law banning abortion except in cases of rape, incest, risk to the mother’s life, or a deadly fetal abnormality. One day later, Eli Lilly and Company, a pharmaceutical company founded in Indiana in 1876, announced that it no longer sees a future in Indiana because the lack of abortion access will "harm its ability to obtain good employees." In the meantime, Eli Lilly "sees a future" in it offices around the world, including Russia, China and Saudia Arabia. You know...all those Human Rights beacons. Beheading gays is one thing, but restricting the right to abortion is a bridge too far and demands next-day response.
The pharmacy supported hitler, and their buildings/headquarters were not bombed by the allies, and they created the world's largest monopoly right after wwII, officially, although they already were before then working in cahoots with pharmmoney in usa, britain, japan, etc for years. All for "money", their main object, not health.
"While Germany was a leading manufacturer of chemicals and pharmaceuticals, international competition led to the creation in 1925 of a massive conglomerate known as IG Farben. The conglomerate included Bayer and other major companies such as BASF, Hoechst (Aventis), and AGFA. Bayer remained an individual subsidiary within the larger monopoly. By 1926, the powerful conglomerate had three times as many assets as all other chemical companies in Germany combined. Bayer and the Holocaust As part of the IG Farben conglomerate, which strongly supported the Third Reich, the Bayer company was complicit in the crimes of the Third Reich." https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/bayer ============================ it was well known at the time, and ever since the war. Here's a short quick internet search Showing results for pharmacy supported hitler Search Results I.G. Farben and pharmacological research - PubMed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › ... by F López-Muñoz · 2009 · Cited by 28 — The pharmaceutical industry and the German National Socialist Regime: I.G. ... operations associated with the criminal activities of the Nazi executive, ... Bayer - Holocaust Encyclopedia https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org › content › article › ba... Jun 13, 2019 — As part of the IG Farben conglomerate, which strongly supported the Third Reich, the Bayer company was complicit in the crimes of Nazi Germany. ================== " By the mid-1970s, Bayer, along with BASF and Hoechst, had returned to economic domination, aiding in the “German Economic Miracle” and re-emerging as one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies. Bayer, however, did little to come to terms with its Nazi past. Fritz ter Meer, convicted of war crimes for his actions at Auschwitz, was elected to Bayer AG’s supervisory board in 1956, a position he retained until 1964. Last Edited: Jun 13, 2019" ============================== There has been overwhelming unquestioned connections: Related searches pfizer and bayer concentration camps rutenol pfizer ww2 gas who made zyklon b bayer dark history zyklon b bayer ig farben now how did ig farben company and auschwitz cooperate together
I may have misread it. The written word leaves too much room for [implied] tonal inflection and observer bias.
Women vote so they would certainly have a voice in it. Given that pregnancy involves more than just the pregnant woman, they should not have the sole voice, however. Just because something would make my life easier, I shouldn't have the sole voice in the matter when it affects someone else. Just as the death penalty is a state issue, with arguments on both sides, this is a state issue, and I am sure there will be arguments on both sides. Besides, the latest member of the Supreme Court can't even define what a woman is, so I don't know what that does for women's rights.
Ken Anderson, The day a man "gets pregnant" and goes stuffers all the physiological / biological / emotional changes....and risk his life during the delivery.. he will have a voice on this matter. Trust me, if men could get pregnant abortion would not only be legal but sacrosanct.