Whenever I hear Ole Joe or overbite Kamala, I pray Dan Quayle would run. Yes, they are worse than him...they want to destry this country I love so much
The endorsements from Republicans for Harris have begun. Liz Cheney has endorsed Harris-Walz. I don't know how much weight she carries. She certainly isn't popular in the state she represented in Congress--Wyoming.
I see that Dick Cheney has also endorsed Kamala. I hope he doesn't shoot anyone in the face this time.
Cheney, like his daughter, is certainly one of the "Deep State" that would say anything to keep America on the path to destruction. He likes war(s) as long as he and his kin don't have to fight in them.
Good morning to all- I find it very interesting that when people like the Cheneys- who are to the bone Republican and have been Republican all their lives and were elected and served as Republican- tell the truth about the vile former occupant, then the minions of the former occupant just can't stand it and try to damn the truth tellers for telling the truth. It seems odd that when Republicans tell the truth about the former occupant, then they are no longer recognized as Republican any more. Perhaps the present Republican party and its supporters are not concerned with the truth much- at least, not when it applies to the lying, felon former occupant. you all be safe and keep well- Ed
No, @Ed Marsh, you don't find it interesting. If you found something interesting, you'd extend your "research" beyond Democrat talking points. Yet, you rarely, if ever, come up with anything that we wouldn't have already heard on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, or any of the other Democrat media organizations. Democrat, good; Republican, bad; and the only good Republicans are those who vote with and for the Democrats. That's the extent of your evaluations.
Good afternoon to all- Mr. Anderson- I have spent my life doing research on a pretty high professional level- of all kinds. I don't need you-who know nothing about me and what I research- to comment on my findings and my statements. And perhaps if what I state is what you hear on the professional information sources, then just maybe what I say here is solid and truthful. And just because media sources you don't like say something you don't agree with, that does not mean these sources are wrong. And it doesn't mean I am wrong, either. And to be as honest with you as you are with me, I find your unquestioning support of the foulest, most chaotic, most crooked and most dishonest politician- the former occupant- to be as distasteful as my opinion apparently is to you. I respect your opinion, even though I think you are dead wrong. That's how things are supposed to work. you all keep well and be safe- Ed
The legacy media depends on those who find some irrelevancy to the act of actual study. Whether out of apathy or some twisted form of loyalty to a news outlet, folks know what they know because of a headline or some heavily edited article and that’s all the further they will ever go in the name of research. A case in point is when MSNBC totally edited one of Joe Rogan’s podcasts to look like he was talking about Kamala.
Bernie Sanders says ‘pragmatic’ Kamala Harris changing positions ‘to win the election’ but still considers her progressive Pragmatic???? An honest person would say she's LYING to win the election. Sanders is also lying.
The fact that they are editing Joe Rogan's favorable comments about Tulsi Gabbard to look like he is referring to Harris shows how desperate they are. It is a very blatant way of lying!