Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Conspiracies & Paranormal' started by Joe Riley, Jun 11, 2016.
You are the Queen of Intuition, Ina!
I’m sorry, It was 190.
You are still the Queen, Ina! (It was probably 210!)
For those who might feel badly concerning the test do please note:
If you answered all 20 questions with a 10, that would give you a score of 200.
Anything other than 10 is subtracted from the 200 for example: a 9 is minus 2, an 8 is minus 3 and so on.
I answered the question regarding playing with children with an 8 which gives me a 197 by itself.
While this particular test does well in that it includes right brain thinking and it excludes logic, it did badly in some ways because personality traits are included. In the example I gave concerning playing with children, it was a double edged sword for certainly I have no grudges against children but the truth is that I do not enjoy "playing" that much, period.
One good thing about the test is that it gives a good barometer reading as to the temperament of an individual. Ina, for example, would be a much easier person to meet than myself for certainly the personality attributes in the test are all too telling.
The truth of the matter is that intuition is not as simple as some would think for imbedded with it is a whole thought process which includes life experiences and reasoning concerning those experiences. Volumes have been written and are still being written for indeed, as of this day, there really is no accurate measure as to how intuitive a person really is.
By the Bye............I scored a 188 and am pretty happy about it and do thank Joe for putting it up.
Awwww now @Bobby Cole, ya jus coudna let me worn tha crown fora coupla more weeks? My head was in the clouds,(or maybe it was tha iclouds), fer a bit? Oh well, I hada idea some-thin weren’t addin up rightly.
Actually, the crown does still belong to you but just in a different perspective. A high intuition does not tell the tale of a person's character. Like I wrote, according to the test, you would be far easier to meet and have a conversation with than myself.
Oh well, we’re just lucky @Yvonne Smith didna pay attention when she was taken tha test. Then we woulda really knowed who’s who.
For some reason it seems as though I might have upset you Ina. I had no intentions of making anyone feel badly but quite the reverse.
I do humbly apologize if that is the case...............
That’s ok @Bobby Cole, somehow in the mid 90’s I ended up in the Academic Who’s Who. I didn’t even know there was such a thing. Michael bought two copies of the book. I think it was a scam. Me, in the What’s What?