If I had my way, the moderators would have to go under the same scrutiny as a juror prior to a criminal trial but even then, to find someone who is unbiased in their political beliefs would be extremely difficult at best. It is my contention that even those who insist that they are “undecided” are rarely mid bubble; they still lean one way or the other.
Super good point @Bobby Cole not that I don't have faith that there must be some unbiased folks, but most likely few and far between. Thanks, helped me out a lot this a.m., denise
Vance seems intelligent and well-spoken, if he can only avoid stepping on his on tongue with stuff like "childless cat lady" remarks for the MSM to focus on and blow out of proportion. Is it just me, or does Walz look a lot like WC Fields?
One of the contributors to the Guttfeld Show said that Walz looks like a baby that just got dressed up to go to a wedding.
This is because the mainstream media is owned and controlled by left-wing liberals, and also the big pharma, and none of those want Trump and Kennedy in office. Kennedy is passionate about cutting bad drug use and making Americans healthy again like we used to be before all the processed and junk foods. Since the debates are shown on national TV, they have to be held in the liberal media strongholds. However, there are a lot of good interviews which are being done by independent media, and people like Tucker Carlson, who do legitimate interviews. The X interview of Musk and Trump was the most watched interview ever, and the ones we see online have millions more people watching than the TV ones have. We can’t do much about the big pharma stranglehold on TV news, but we can choose to watch more of the non-biased news put out by other means, like X, YT, rumble, and other free media. (Free like not controlled)