This Was, Is And Continues To Be Known: No Evidence Lockdowns Work

Discussion in 'Viruses' started by Martin Alonzo, Oct 29, 2020.

  1. Jeff Elohim

    Jeff Elohim Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2020
    Messages:
    1,189
    Likes Received:
    253
    Daily, frequently. Whomever His Word Abides Within , never trusts the shots nor believes the lies of the pandemic or shutdowns or isolation wittingly or willingly.

    Your point is still not clear - i.e. 'cavalier' ?
     
    #196
  2. Al Amoling

    Al Amoling Veteran Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2016
    Messages:
    2,787
    Likes Received:
    4,617
    your attitude that 6 million people is trifling number.
     
    #197
    Don Alaska likes this.
  3. Jeff Elohim

    Jeff Elohim Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2020
    Messages:
    1,189
    Likes Received:
    253
    6 million is serious, and was a century ago.
    6 billion , today, is worse.
    Thus, the crimes against humanity today are 1 thousand times or even more devastating and disastrous today than last century by hitler.
     
    #198
  4. Jeff Elohim

    Jeff Elohim Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2020
    Messages:
    1,189
    Likes Received:
    253
    "No evidence lockdowns work"
    So why the toxins being injected in babies, children, women, and men ?
    Why "a needle to destroy him"? (man) . Why the true evidence ignored, the easy way to eliminate disease ? (there would be no more epidemics, no more pandemics, if what works was done, instead of putting toxins in babies)

    Here's an excerpt from about 1955, give or take some years:

    "Apropos of this, the human body is known to be a media subject to an infinite range in the type of food it offers for bacteria. It is alkaline one day and acid the next. Different areas and organs form a varied menu for the billions of "immunizing" bacteria injected into it as "preventative medicine." These are known to congregate on the valves of the heart. They are toxins similar to those found in diseased tissue and cells. These are questions bacteriologists are asking: Do they induce sickness wherever they range? Do they produce pathology in the delicate membranes of the lungs, and influenced by their environment, become the ravaging tubercular bacilli of tuberculosis? Do they congregate upon the valves of the heart and break down this delicate structure, accounting for the astounding increase of heart conditions among children, since 1900? Do they ravage the blood vessels, the lymphatics, and the eyes, causing "grave concern" among public health officials over the widespread occurrence of cancer in children, which kills two-thirds as many as whooping cough?

    These are questions whose answers still remain unanswered in the laboratory and clinic, but the marked increase of old diseases and the development of new ones parallel the expansion of preventive medicine, and warrant suspicion and examination.

    Long ago, science warned physicians about the danger of post-vaccinal sleeping sickness, poliomyelitis, syphilis, and other diseases. These diseases occur in children and adults alike following inoculations. Physicians know that a percentage of those they vaccinate or inoculate for diphtheria, scarlet fever, or measles, will die of shock, and that others will be projected into the Morphic night of sleeping sickness, or the disfiguring horrors of polio, while others will be stricken with rheumatic fever, arthritis, blindness, and suppurating rashes of all kinds.

    Yet these results are justified by immunologists on the premise that the procedures are necessary to safeguard the population from epidemics. They overlook the fact that epidemics diminished as man purified his exterior environment.

    It is conceivable that the filth that once beset him in rags has come forth in a needle to destroy him. "
     
    #199

Share This Page