1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ww2 Discussion

Discussion in 'History & Geography' started by Richard Whiting, Feb 7, 2023.

  1. Richard Whiting

    Richard Whiting Very Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2022
    Messages:
    866
    Likes Received:
    755
    I could be mistaken , but I'm pretty sure that the treaty between Germany and Japan stipulated that Germany would declare war ONLY IF JAPAN WAS ATTACKED. Since Japan attacked the U.S. FIRST, Germany was not required to declare war on America.
     
    #151
    Marie Mallery and Tom Galty like this.
  2. Lambert Regenlöf

    Lambert Regenlöf Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    May 16, 2021
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    93
    You are correct. "Is attacked" is the probably universal English translation. The German version reads "angegriffen wird" and the italian "venisse attaccata". I don't know Japanese, but may investigate that version later.

    So now we can ask, just exactly what do "angegriffen" and "attaccata" mean? Or even the English "attack". How did the signers understand the words? The word is not defined in the document itself.

    "Attack", as in 'launch a violent military assault' is one interpretation, and seems to be the first choice in dictionaries for eingreifen and attaccare. But rare are the words of any language with a single meaning, even though context narrows them down.

    Besides "attack", eingreifen is also translated as "intervene", "interfere"; and attaccare as "engage", or "assault" either physically or verbally, the same as the English "attack". There are tamer translations as well.

    I believe the signers intended the word to mean a direct physical attack. I also believe that, psychologically, they would have viewed a declaration of war as the equivalent of such. In the case of Japan, the U.S. had been conducting an economic, resource, and trade war for some time already. The Japanese direct physical "assault" (attack) was intended to loosen the United States' "interfering" (begreifende) "attachment" (attaccato) to Japan's desired resources and trade partners.
     
    #152
    Richard Whiting likes this.
  3. Richard Whiting

    Richard Whiting Very Well-Known Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2022
    Messages:
    866
    Likes Received:
    755
    While the movie "Saving Private Ryan" is a fiction , it is based on the true story of Private Frederick "Fritz" Niland.

    After the "Sullivan Incident" where 5 brothers were killed when their ship was torpedoed and sunk in the Pacific. It was decided that groups of brothers would no longer be in a single unit. Hence, the Niland Brothers were spit up and assigned to other units.

    The War Department received a report that 3 Niland Brothers had been killed in combat. As the only remaining son, Private Frederick Niland was rescued from Normandy and sent home .
    A year later, it turned out that one of the 3 brothers, was NOT K.I.A. but had been in a Japanese P.O.W. camp in Burma. He too returned home.

    PS:
    In honor of the Sullivan Brothers, in 1995 built and commissioned the U.S. Navy named a guided missile destroyer, The Sullivans.
     
    #153
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2023
    Marie Mallery likes this.
  4. Marie Mallery

    Marie Mallery Veteran Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2021
    Messages:
    12,293
    Likes Received:
    11,977
    Anyone remember the WW11 Vets attacking the WW1 vets in DC.? Eisenhower, Patton, MacArthur ,etc led the way.

     
    #154
  5. Dwight Ward

    Dwight Ward Veteran Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2020
    Messages:
    3,714
    Likes Received:
    4,671
    I remember reading about this in uncensored accounts of our domestic history. It is disgusting. Promises made to our brave soldiers were not kept and some of those 'heroes' you cite led the way in knocking them down. I think truth is very often painful.
     
    #155
    Marie Mallery likes this.
  6. Marie Mallery

    Marie Mallery Veteran Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2021
    Messages:
    12,293
    Likes Received:
    11,977
    Yes at times the truth hurts. Then again, they are taught to follow orders, but this is one of those times they may have done better to remember the other part of their oath they took, " both foreign and domestic" kind of thing.
     
    #156
    Dwight Ward likes this.
  7. Tom Galty

    Tom Galty Veteran Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2018
    Messages:
    1,123
    Likes Received:
    1,629
    The Chindits.

    A army that fought behind the Japanese lines.

    Mostly forgotten about now.

    Chindits - Wikipedia
     
    #157
    Marie Mallery likes this.
  8. Marie Mallery

    Marie Mallery Veteran Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2021
    Messages:
    12,293
    Likes Received:
    11,977
    I for one never heard of them, may look into it later. So much we don't know, huh Tom?
     
    #158
    Tom Galty likes this.
  9. Bobby Cole

    Bobby Cole Supreme Member
    Task Force Registered

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2015
    Messages:
    13,702
    Likes Received:
    26,304
    Just a short quip, or rant if ya’ll prefer.

    So, Dec. 7 has come and gone and I mentioned to Yvonne on that day (and the day after) that no one in particular from the Biden administration was at the Memorial Ceremony.
    Oh, Biden wrote a small piece on X as did Speaker Johnson and a couple of others but no one of any real significance bothered to take the trip and to at least shake the hands of the last survivors of that day in 1941.
    Note: I guess President Biden was too tired from his trips to the Amazon and Africa to make the trip to honor real Americans.

    BUT…..The Biden administration DID find the money to send Pelosi and her entourage to Luxembourg in honor of the 80th anniversary of the Battle of the Bulge.
    The question I have is: Why Nancy? Oh yeah, Luxembourg has some Great beer.

    To be fair, D. Trump wasn’t there either but he isn’t the President yet. The President AND / Or the Vice President should have been there and not just spewing a few words on X.
     
    #159
  10. Marie Mallery

    Marie Mallery Veteran Member
    Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2021
    Messages:
    12,293
    Likes Received:
    11,977
    I suppose I didn't make myself clear, same ones I'm referring to.
     
    #160

Share This Page